The Supreme Court's 2025 docket includes cases impacting constitutional law, business regulation, and rights. Key cases address digital privacy, administrative law, employment discrimination, and free speech, shaping legal practice and policy for years.

The Supreme Court's 2025 term features significant cases examining the boundaries of government regulatory authority and constitutional protections in the digital age. Several cases challenge the scope of federal agency rulemaking power following recent precedents that limited administrative deference. These cases will determine how much discretion agencies retain in interpreting statutes and promulgating regulations affecting industries from environmental protection to financial services. Decisions in these matters could fundamentally reshape administrative law and the regulatory landscape, impacting how businesses navigate compliance and how agencies enforce statutory mandates.

Digital privacy and technology issues occupy prominent positions on the docket. The Court will address whether warrantless access to cell phone location data violates Fourth Amendment protections, extending its previous rulings on digital privacy to encompass real-time location tracking by law enforcement. Another case examines whether social media platforms can be held liable for third-party content under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, potentially altering the legal framework governing online platforms. These decisions will influence both criminal procedure and the balance between free expression and content moderation on digital platforms.

Employment law cases this term tackle questions of workplace discrimination and arbitration agreements. The Court will clarify the scope of Title VII protections for employees who experience discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity, potentially expanding or limiting protections established in recent precedents. Another case addresses the enforceability of class action waivers in employment arbitration agreements, determining whether employers can require employees to resolve disputes individually rather than through collective actions. These rulings will significantly impact employment practices and litigation strategies nationwide.

Free speech cases on the docket examine the intersection of First Amendment protections with compelled speech and government regulation. One case considers whether states can require social media platforms to host certain content, testing the limits of government's power to regulate private speech platforms. Another addresses campaign finance disclosure requirements and their impact on anonymous political speech. The Court's decisions in these cases will shape the boundaries of protected expression and the government's ability to regulate speech in service of competing public interests.